Cases4102244/2019

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

3 March 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Struck out for non-pursuit under rule 38(1)(d) after the claimant failed to respond to tribunal directions by 29 January 2025 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

Mrs P Donaldson brought a claim against Glasgow City Council. On 15 January 2025, the tribunal directed the claimant to provide written reasons by 29 January 2025 or request a hearing to show why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to comply with this direction.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing despite being given the opportunity to do so.

Practical note

Claimants must actively respond to tribunal directions and pursue their claims, or risk having them struck out for non-pursuit even without a hearing.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4102244/2019
Decision date
3 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No