Cases115914/2010

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

3 March 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's unless order dated 20 January 2025 requiring written reasons by 3 February 2025 or a request for hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

Mrs McCann brought a claim against Glasgow City Council. On 20 January 2025, the tribunal issued an unless order requiring the claimant to provide written reasons by 3 February 2025 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to comply with this order.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant did not provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing in response to the unless order.

Practical note

Failure to respond to an unless order requiring a claimant to show cause why a claim should not be struck out will result in automatic strike-out for non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
115914/2010
Decision date
3 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No