Cases6016853/2024

Claimant v Liverpool Trading Ltd

28 February 2025Before Employment Judge CallanManchesteron papers

Outcome

Default judgment£1,808

Individual claims

Wrongful Dismissalsucceeded

Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Respondent failed to present a valid response within time. Under Rule 22, judgment entered in default for the claimant for notice pay.

Redundancy Paysucceeded

Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. Respondent failed to present a valid response within time. Under Rule 22, judgment entered in default for the claimant.

Holiday Paysucceeded

Respondent failed to pay the claimant her outstanding holiday entitlement. Respondent failed to present a valid response within time. Under Rule 22, judgment entered in default for the claimant.

Facts

Mrs F Evans was dismissed by reason of redundancy by Liverpool Trading Ltd. She was owed notice pay, a statutory redundancy payment, and outstanding holiday pay. The respondent failed to present a valid response to the claim within the prescribed time limit.

Decision

Employment Judge Callan entered judgment in default under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The claimant was awarded £732.16 for notice pay, £732.16 for redundancy pay, and £343.20 for holiday pay, totalling £1,807.52.

Practical note

When a respondent fails to file a response in time, the tribunal can enter default judgment on contractual and statutory claims without a hearing under Rule 22.

Award breakdown

Notice pay£732
Holiday pay£343
Redundancy pay£732

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 22

Case details

Case number
6016853/2024
Decision date
28 February 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No