Claimant v Evri Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the claim of unfair dismissal to be well-founded under Rule 22 (default judgment procedure). The respondent failed to respond to the claim, allowing judgment to be entered in the claimant's favour.
Facts
Mr Pointon brought an unfair dismissal claim against Evri Limited. The respondent failed to file a response to the claim. Under the tribunal's default judgment procedure (Rule 22), the claim was determined on the papers without a full merits hearing.
Decision
The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim to be well-founded and entered judgment in favour of the claimant. A separate remedy hearing was scheduled for 17 November 2025 to determine the compensation to be awarded.
Practical note
Where a respondent fails to enter a response, a tribunal can enter default judgment on liability, with quantum determined at a separate remedy hearing.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6021347/2024
- Decision date
- 27 February 2025
- Hearing type
- default judgment
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Name
- Evri Limited
- Sector
- logistics
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No