Cases3310786/2023

Claimant v Royal National Lifeboat Institution

26 February 2025Before Employment Judge Gumbiti-ZimutoReadingremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalnot determined

Preliminary hearing addressed only the jurisdiction issue regarding time limits. Tribunal found it had jurisdiction to hear the claim as it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim in time due to genuine confusion about the effective date of termination. Claim presented within a further reasonable period.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)not determined

Preliminary hearing addressed only the jurisdiction issue regarding time limits. Tribunal found it just and equitable to extend time, noting that the claimant genuinely believed the correct date for time limit calculation was 2 June rather than 3 March, and that prejudice to both parties would have existed regardless of whether the claim was presented in May or September.

Facts

The claimant was a Coxswain at Aldeburgh Lifeboat Station who could not return to his role following spinal surgery in 2021. He was dismissed on grounds of ill-health capability on 27 February 2023 with notice effective from 3 March 2023. The claimant opted for pay in lieu of notice, which would cover the period to 2 June 2023. There was confusion caused by contradictory correspondence about whether his last day was 3 March or 2 June. The claimant genuinely believed time limits ran from 2 June, contacted ACAS on 25 June 2023, and filed his tribunal claim on 2 September 2023.

Decision

The tribunal found it had jurisdiction to hear both the unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims despite them being presented out of time. For unfair dismissal, the tribunal accepted it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present his claim in time because he genuinely but mistakenly believed the effective date was 2 June rather than 3 March, and the claim was presented within a further reasonable period. For disability discrimination, the tribunal found it just and equitable to extend time on the same basis.

Practical note

Genuine confusion about the effective date of termination caused by contradictory correspondence from an employer can render it not reasonably practicable to present an unfair dismissal claim in time, and make it just and equitable to extend time for discrimination claims.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.207BEmployment Rights Act 1996 s.111(2)Equality Act 2010 s.140BEquality Act 2010 s.123Employment Tribunals Act 1996 s.18A

Case details

Case number
3310786/2023
Decision date
26 February 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
charity
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Coxswain

Claimant representation

Represented
No