Claimant v Urbangreenbank Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. This appears to be a default judgment under Rule 22, indicating the respondent did not respond to the claim or participate in proceedings.
Facts
The claimant E Hall brought a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages against Urbangreenbank Limited. The respondent failed to respond to the claim or participate in the proceedings. The tribunal issued a default judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
Decision
The tribunal found in favour of the claimant under Rule 22 as a default judgment. The respondent was ordered to pay £563.20 gross for the unauthorised deduction from wages. The scheduled hearing for 10 April 2025 was cancelled.
Practical note
Where a respondent fails to respond to or defend a claim for unlawful deduction of wages, the tribunal can issue a default judgment under Rule 22 without a hearing.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6019218/2024
- Decision date
- 24 February 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No