Cases4100085/2024

Claimant v ISS Facility Services Limited

24 February 2025Before Employment Judge M A MacleodScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)struck out

The claimant's section 15 (discrimination arising from disability) claim was struck out because despite being given multiple opportunities to clarify and particularise the claim, she failed to provide sufficient detail. The tribunal found the claim lacked clarity as to what 'something arising' from her disability occurred and what specific unfavourable treatment was alleged, meaning it had no reasonable prospect of success and fair notice could not be given to the respondent.

Facts

The claimant, represented by her sister (a lay representative), brought discrimination claims including a section 15 Equality Act claim (discrimination arising from disability). Despite repeated tribunal orders and opportunities dating back to April 2024, the claimant failed to properly particularise her section 15 claim. The tribunal had warned in October 2024 that failure to clarify could result in strike-out. The claimant alleged disciplinary action related to stress absences, being overlooked for promotion, and lack of notice for meetings, but failed to provide necessary detail even after further questioning.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claimant's section 15 Equality Act claim on the basis it had no reasonable prospect of success under Rule 38(1)(a). Despite multiple opportunities and warnings, the claimant failed to sufficiently particularise what 'something arising' from her disability occurred and what specific unfavourable treatment was alleged, meaning the respondent could not receive fair notice and the tribunal could not properly determine the claim.

Practical note

Unrepresented or poorly represented claimants must still meet minimum standards of particularisation in discrimination claims, and repeated failure to clarify claims despite tribunal warnings and opportunities will result in strike-out even in discrimination cases.

Legal authorities cited

Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust [2007] ICR 1126 CAFaron Fariba v Pfizer Limited & Others UKEAT/0605/10/CEA

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 Rule 38(1)(c)Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 Rule 38(1)(a)Equality Act 2010 s.15Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 Rule 37(2)

Case details

Case number
4100085/2024
Decision date
24 February 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
professional services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep