Cases2400875/2024

Claimant v Hayden's Kitchen At The Gallows Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation)

24 February 2025Before Employment Judge ChildeManchester

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£11,217

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015, warranting a 25% uplift to the compensatory award.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars when the proceedings were begun. The tribunal found no exceptional circumstances that would make an award unjust or inequitable, awarding four weeks' gross pay.

Facts

Miss L Jones was employed by Hayden's Kitchen At The Gallows Limited, a hospitality company now in voluntary liquidation. The claimant was dismissed and brought claims for unfair dismissal and failure to provide written statement of employment particulars. The respondent failed to follow the ACAS Code on disciplinary procedures.

Decision

The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code, warranting a 25% uplift to compensation. The respondent also failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars. The claimant was awarded a total of £11,217.37.

Practical note

Even when a respondent is represented and in liquidation, complete failure to follow ACAS disciplinary procedures will result in the maximum 25% uplift and additional penalties for failing to provide basic employment particulars.

Award breakdown

Basic award£696
Compensatory award£9,594

Adjustments

ACAS uplift+25%

Respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992s.38 Employment Act 2002

Case details

Case number
2400875/2024
Decision date
24 February 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
No