Claimant v Ambitions Limited

The claimant's complaints regarding holiday pay for her employment up until 18 August 2021 were struck out on the grounds of cause of action estoppel, as these matters had already been determined in previous proceedings (case 3315210/2021) before Employment Judge King.

The claim for failure to provide itemised pay statements for employment up until 18 August 2021 was struck out on the grounds of cause of action estoppel, having been dismissed as not well founded in the previous proceedings.

The claimant alleged multiple breaches of contract including failure to provide written contract, fake ID/employee numbers, incorrect payslips, and denial of holidays. The tribunal did not reach a determination at this preliminary hearing, listing the matter for further case management.

The claimant ticked the box for race discrimination but did not provide comprehensible particulars despite orders. The tribunal noted she had previously attempted to advance discrimination claims before EJ King but was unable to identify a protected characteristic. Further clarification ordered.

The claimant ticked the box for sex discrimination but did not provide adequate particulars. The tribunal noted the allegations remained incomprehensible and required further exploration at the next preliminary hearing.

The claimant ticked the box for religion or belief discrimination but did not provide comprehensible particulars. The tribunal could not identify specific allegations and ordered further clarification.

The claimant ticked the box for protected disclosure but the tribunal found no evidence from the documents that she was advancing a whistleblowing claim. The claimant was ordered to explain what the alleged disclosure was and what detriment followed.