Cases2217991/2024

Claimant v Ashfield Healthcare Limited

20 February 2025Before Employment Judge JM WadeLeedsremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)not determined

Preliminary hearing determined that the claimant was a disabled person within Section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 by reason of dyslexia and pernicious anaemia from October 2023. The substantive disability discrimination claims remain to be determined at a future hearing.

Facts

The claimant brought disability discrimination claims against four respondents: Ashfield Healthcare Limited, Chiesi Ltd, and two individual respondents. A preliminary hearing was held to determine whether the claimant was a disabled person under the Equality Act 2010. The hearing was conducted remotely via CVP with the claimant represented by Mrs Kirby, respondents 1 and 4 represented by counsel, and respondents 2 and 3 represented by a solicitor.

Decision

The tribunal determined at a preliminary hearing that the claimant was a disabled person within Section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 by reason of two conditions: dyslexia and pernicious anaemia, with effect from October 2023 onwards. The substantive disability discrimination claims remain to be heard.

Practical note

This preliminary judgment establishes disability status for purposes of the Equality Act 2010, paving the way for the substantive discrimination claims to proceed at a future full merits hearing.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.6

Case details

Case number
2217991/2024
Decision date
20 February 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep