Cases2407357/2023

Claimant v Pilgrims Food Masters UK Limited

20 February 2025Before Employment Judge SharkettManchesterin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(disability)failed

Tribunal found treatment was not motivated by claimant's disability. Respondent would have treated a hypothetical comparator who had exhausted CSP for non-disability related absences in the same manner due to high sickness absence levels on site and need to strictly apply absence management policy.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)failed

Tribunal found including disability-related absences when calculating CSP eligibility was a proportionate means of achieving legitimate aims of managing absence and maintaining fair treatment. The refusal to exercise discretion to extend sick pay did not arise from disability but from claimant having Weil's disease while having exhausted CSP entitlement.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)failed

Tribunal found it would not be reasonable to expect employer to discount all disability-related absences when calculating CSP or to exercise discretion to pay CSP indefinitely. Such adjustments would place unreasonable financial burden on employer and remove incentive to return to work.

Facts

Claimant worked for respondent for over 20 years as dispatch team leader. He suffered from OCD, PTSD and dissociative personality disorder. He had multiple disability-related absences between 2019-2022, exhausting his 13-week company sick pay (CSP) entitlement in each rolling year. In January 2023 he was hospitalised with Weil's disease (non-disability related) but was only paid statutory sick pay as he had already exhausted CSP due to prior disability absences. He raised grievances which were unsuccessful. He resigned in August 2023 and brought discrimination claims.

Decision

Tribunal dismissed all claims. It found respondent did not directly discriminate as it would have treated non-disabled comparator who exhausted CSP the same way. The s.15 claim failed as including disability absences in CSP calculation and refusing discretionary extension were proportionate means of achieving legitimate aims of managing high sickness absence. Reasonable adjustments claim failed as automatically discounting all disability absences or paying CSP indefinitely would be unreasonable.

Practical note

Employers are not required to automatically discount all disability-related absences when calculating company sick pay entitlement or to exercise discretion to pay indefinitely, provided the absence management policy serves legitimate aims and is applied proportionately.

Legal authorities cited

Pnaiser v NHS England [2016] IRLR 170Igen v Wong [2005] ICR 931Gould v St John's Downshire Hill [2021] ICR 1

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.13Equality Act 2010 Schedule 8 para 20Equality Act 2010 s.136Equality Act 2010 s.20-23Equality Act 2010 s.15

Case details

Case number
2407357/2023
Decision date
20 February 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
manufacturing
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
Dispatch team leader
Service
22 years

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep