Cases111678/2010

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

20 February 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue the claim. Claimant failed to respond to tribunal's unless order requiring written reasons by 23 January 2025 or a request for hearing.

Facts

This was a claim filed in 2010 against Glasgow City Council and Cordia (Services) LLP. The tribunal issued an unless order on 9 January 2025 requiring the claimant to provide written reasons by 23 January 2025 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to comply with this order.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing following the unless order.

Practical note

Employment tribunals will strike out claims for non-pursuit where claimants fail to comply with unless orders requiring them to show cause why their claim should continue.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
111678/2010
Decision date
20 February 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No