Cases6014470/2024

Claimant v ISG Retail Limited (in administration)

20 February 2025Before Employment Judge DavidsonLondon Southremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£16,496

Individual claims

Failure to Inform & Consultsucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its duties under section 188 of TULR(C)A 1992 by failing to consult properly or at all with the claimant regarding proposed redundancies. The claimant was informed on 20 September 2024 that he was being made redundant with immediate effect along with more than 20 other employees, triggering collective consultation requirements which were not met.

Facts

The claimant was employed by ISG Retail Limited. On 20 September 2024, the claimant was informed that he was being made redundant with immediate effect, along with more than 20 other employees. The respondent company was in administration. The respondent failed to carry out proper or any collective consultation as required by law before implementing the redundancies.

Decision

The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to comply with its statutory duty under section 188 of TULR(C)A 1992 to consult with affected employees regarding proposed redundancies. The tribunal awarded a protective award for the maximum period of 90 days, amounting to £16,495.89 based on the claimant's weekly wage of £1,286.54.

Practical note

Employers making 20 or more employees redundant at one establishment must undertake proper collective consultation; failure to do so will result in a protective award of up to 90 days' pay per affected employee, even where the employer is insolvent.

Award breakdown

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

TULR(C)A 1992 s.188

Case details

Case number
6014470/2024
Decision date
20 February 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
No

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
No