Cases105182/2011

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

19 February 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 38 for non-pursuit after the claimant failed to provide written reasons by the deadline of 3rd February 2025 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

This case was brought by Mr L McNeil as executor of Mrs L McNeil against Glasgow City Council. The case number suggests it was filed in 2011. On 20 January 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 3 February 2025 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to respond but failed to do so or request a hearing.

Practical note

Claims that are not actively pursued will be struck out, even in cases involving executors continuing claims on behalf of deceased claimants, and tribunals will provide fair notice before doing so.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
105182/2011
Decision date
19 February 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No