Claimant v ISS Mediclean Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the claimant's contract had been validly varied on 17 August 2020 to reflect a combined role at £12.00 per hour for 40 hours per week. The claimant had signed and agreed to the variation, and even if temporary, he performed his obligations without protest for three years, constituting variation by conduct. The claimant was paid according to his contractual entitlement and therefore suffered no unlawful deduction from wages.
Facts
The claimant worked for the respondent as a Patient Services Supervisor from 2013. In June 2020, he took on additional duties as Late Shift Duty Manager and signed a contract variation on 17 August 2020 agreeing to a combined role at £12.00 per hour (equivalent to £25,000 per annum). The claimant understood this to be temporary, but performed the dual role for three years before raising a grievance in July 2023, claiming he should be paid more for doing two roles. He brought a claim for unlawful deduction of wages while still employed.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the claim. The judge found that the claimant had validly agreed to a permanent contractual variation in August 2020, which amended his job title and salary to reflect the combined role. The plain wording of the signed variation letter showed it was permanent, not temporary. Even if the claimant misunderstood this, he had performed the contract without protest for three years, constituting variation by conduct. The claimant had been paid according to his contractual entitlement and therefore suffered no unlawful deduction from wages.
Practical note
A signed contractual variation with clear language will be binding even if a party later claims to have misunderstood its effect, particularly where the employee performs the varied contract without protest for an extended period, constituting variation by conduct.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2301640/2024
- Decision date
- 19 February 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 0.5
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Employment details
- Role
- Patient Services Supervisor & Late Shift Duty Manager
- Salary band
- £25,000–£30,000
- Service
- 14 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No