Cases115468/2009

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

18 February 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out for non-pursuit under rule 38(1)(d). The Executor failed to respond by 4 February 2025 or request a hearing after being given opportunity by the Tribunal on 14 January 2025.

Facts

This was a claim brought by Mrs B Timplalexis who has since deceased. The claim was pursued by her Executor. The case number indicates it was filed in 2009. On 14 January 2025, the Tribunal gave the Executor until 4 February 2025 to provide reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The Executor failed to respond or request a hearing.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued. The Executor failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing by the deadline.

Practical note

Claims can be struck out for non-pursuit where an executor or representative fails to engage with tribunal directions, even in long-running cases involving deceased claimants.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
115468/2009
Decision date
18 February 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No