Cases2600569/2024

Claimant v Secretary of State for Business and Trade

18 February 2025Before Employment Judge R AdkinsonMidlands Eastin person

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Redundancy Paynot determined

This was a preliminary hearing to determine jurisdiction and time limit issues only. The tribunal ruled it had jurisdiction to hear the claim as it was presented in time. The substantive claim will proceed to be heard and determined in the usual way with directions to be provided separately.

Facts

The claimant was employed by One Button Ltd which went into creditor's voluntary liquidation. She applied to the Secretary of State for Business & Trade for a payment from the redundancy payments service, and the Secretary of State made a decision on her application on 14 February 2024. The claimant commenced early conciliation and presented a claim to the employment tribunal. The second respondent did not present a response and was barred from taking part in the proceedings.

Decision

The tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine jurisdiction, specifically whether the claim was presented in time. Considering ERA 1996 section 188, the tribunal concluded the claim was in time because it was presented within 3 months of the Secretary of State's decision on 14 February 2024. The tribunal therefore has jurisdiction to hear and determine the claim, which will proceed with directions to be provided separately.

Practical note

Claims against the Secretary of State for redundancy payments must be presented within 3 months of the decision on the application to the redundancy payments service under ERA 1996 s.188.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.188

Case details

Case number
2600569/2024
Decision date
18 February 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
central government
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
No