Cases1311314/2020

Claimant v Heartlands Fryers Limited (in liquidation)

18 February 2025Before Employment Judge Gordon WalkerBirminghamon papers

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£18,253

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The respondent failed to present a response within the relevant time limit. Under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, judgment was entered in default. The tribunal found the claim well-founded and awarded compensation based on 24 weeks of net pay plus loss of statutory rights.

Wrongful Dismissalsucceeded

The claim for wrongful dismissal was well-founded and succeeded. However, no additional award was made because the compensatory award for unfair dismissal already included compensation for lost earnings during what would have been the claimant's notice period.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in respect of unpaid holiday pay in the period from 25 March 2017 until 24 March 2021. The tribunal awarded compensation for the maximum two-year period prior to the claim date as permitted by the Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The complaint that the respondent failed to pay a contractual redundancy payment was well-founded. However, no compensation was awarded because the claimant's redundancy payment had already been settled in full by the Redundancy Payments Service (RPS).

Othersucceeded

The respondent failed to provide written itemised pay statements as required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 from 25 March 2017 until 22 April 2021. The tribunal found this failure proved and awarded compensation under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide written statement of employment particulars, awarding four weeks' gross pay.

Facts

The claimant was employed by Heartlands Fryers Limited from 25 March 2017 until his dismissal on 26 May 2021. The respondent company went into liquidation. The claimant was not provided with written pay statements or a written statement of employment particulars during his employment. He was not paid for accrued holiday and his contractual redundancy payment was ultimately paid by the Redundancy Payments Service.

Decision

The tribunal entered judgment in default as the respondent failed to present a response. All claims succeeded. The tribunal awarded £12,492.56 for unfair dismissal (24 weeks' net pay plus loss of statutory rights), £3,360 for unpaid holiday pay covering the two-year period prior to the claim, and £2,400 for failure to provide written employment particulars (four weeks' gross pay).

Practical note

Default judgments can be obtained where a respondent in liquidation fails to defend, but awards are subject to recoupment regulations and may ultimately need to be claimed from the National Insurance Fund.

Award breakdown

Compensatory award£12,493
Holiday pay£3,360
Loss of statutory rights£500

Award equivalent: 30.4 weeks' gross pay

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 22Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014ERA 1996 s.8Employment Act 2002 s.38

Case details

Case number
1311314/2020
Decision date
18 February 2025
Hearing type
default judgment
Hearing days
1
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
No

Employment details

Salary band
£30,000–£40,000
Service
4 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No