Cases2500733/2023

Claimant v Leslie Brown Contracting Limited

14 February 2025Before Employment Judge AEPittTeessidein person

Outcome

Partly successful£4,147

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages for December 2022 and January 2023, in breach of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The respondent failed to provide the claimant with written particulars of employment as required by section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996, entitling the claimant to an award under section 38 Employment Act 2002.

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant did not have the requisite qualifying period of continuous employment to bring an unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claim.

Direct Discrimination(sex)failed

The direct discrimination claims based on events in 2021 were presented out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. Claims based on the failure to pay wages in December 2022 and January 2023 were not made out on the merits.

Harassment(sex)failed

Sexual harassment claims based on events in 2021 were presented out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. Claims based on the failure to pay wages in December 2022 and January 2023 were not made out on the merits.

Facts

Ms Gaines brought claims against her former employer Leslie Brown Contracting Limited, alleging unlawful deduction of wages for December 2022 and January 2023, failure to provide written particulars of employment, unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, and sexual harassment. Some of the discrimination and harassment claims related to events in 2021, while others related to the non-payment of wages in late 2022 and early 2023. The claimant was represented by her father, while the respondent company was represented by its managing director Leslie Brown.

Decision

The tribunal upheld the claimant's claims for unlawful deduction of wages (£3,267) and failure to provide written particulars (£880). However, it dismissed the unfair dismissal claim due to lack of qualifying service, struck out the 2021 discrimination and harassment claims as out of time with no just and equitable extension, and dismissed the discrimination and harassment claims based on non-payment of wages on their merits. Total award: £4,147.

Practical note

Claims for sex discrimination and harassment must be brought within strict time limits; failure to pay wages does not automatically constitute sex discrimination or harassment without evidence of a protected characteristic link.

Award breakdown

Unpaid wages£3,267

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.1Equality Act 2010Employment Rights Act 1996 s.203Employment Act 2002 s.38

Case details

Case number
2500733/2023
Decision date
14 February 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
construction
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep