Claimant v Booker Limited

The tribunal found that the Respondent did not exclude the Claimant from social activities up to and including September 2022 because of her disability. The claim related to alleged exclusion by Mr H Sheikh.

The tribunal found that Miss J Newby's statements of 'we're all in the same boat' when the Claimant asked for help between March 2022 and May 2023 did not constitute direct discrimination because of disability.

The tribunal found that refusing to let the Claimant text in when reporting lateness or absence from January 2023 to early March 2023 was not direct discrimination because of disability.

The tribunal found that issuing the Claimant with a final written warning on 24 March 2023 was not direct discrimination because of disability.

The tribunal found that failing to pay the Claimant sick pay correctly in or around April and May 2023 was not victimisation under the Equality Act 2010.

The tribunal found that recording incorrect information on form SSP1 in or around April and May 2023 was not victimisation under the Equality Act 2010.

The tribunal found that calling the police on 12 May 2023 was not an act of victimisation under the Equality Act 2010.

The tribunal found that the provision, criterion or practice requiring employees to telephone (rather than text) when late or absent did not constitute indirect discrimination against the Claimant because of disability.

The tribunal found that the Respondent did not fail to make reasonable adjustments in relation to the PCP requiring employees to telephone when late or absent from work.

The tribunal found that refusing to allow the Claimant to text rather than telephone between January and early March 2023 was not discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010.

The tribunal found that issuing the Claimant with a final written warning on 24 March 2023 was not discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010.

The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages in connection with a bonus paid to the Claimant in May 2023 was not well-founded.