Claimant v Mitie Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. The judgment does not provide detailed reasoning but indicates the tribunal concluded the dismissal was fair after considering the evidence over a three-day hearing.
The tribunal found the complaint of direct race discrimination was not well-founded. After hearing evidence over three days, the tribunal concluded there was no race discrimination in the treatment of the claimant.
Facts
Mr Amoah brought claims of unfair dismissal and direct race discrimination against his former employer, Mitie Limited. The case was heard over three days by video in December 2024. Mr Amoah represented himself while Mitie was represented by counsel.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed both claims. After considering the evidence, the tribunal unanimously found that the dismissal was fair and that there was no direct race discrimination in the treatment of Mr Amoah.
Practical note
This judgment provides no detailed reasoning, representing only the formal record of dismissal of both unfair dismissal and race discrimination claims after a full merits hearing.
Case details
- Case number
- 2217148/2023
- Decision date
- 13 February 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 3
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- Mitie Limited
- Sector
- professional services
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No