Claimant v Glasgow City Council
Outcome
Individual claims
Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for non-pursuit. The claimant was given until 28 January 2025 to provide written reasons or request a hearing but failed to respond or provide an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out.
Facts
The claimant Mrs A Gregg brought a claim against Glasgow City Council. On 7 January 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant until 28 January 2025 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide any acceptable reason.
Decision
The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain or request a hearing but failed to do so.
Practical note
Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal orders, or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit even without a hearing.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 105276/2006
- Decision date
- 12 February 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Name
- Glasgow City Council
- Sector
- local government
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No