Cases121161/2008

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

12 February 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. Claimant was given opportunity until 26 September 2024 to provide written reasons or request a hearing but failed to give acceptable reasons or request a hearing.

Facts

Ms M Connolly brought a claim against Glasgow City Council. On 12 September 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 26 September 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal's direction to show cause why the claim should not be struck out.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal directions, or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 Rule 37Rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
121161/2008
Decision date
12 February 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No