Cases108310/2005

Claimant v Clackmannanshire Council

11 February 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant failed to provide written reasons by 27 September 2024 or request a hearing after being given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim against Clackmannanshire Council. On 13 September 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 27 September 2024 to provide written reasons or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out for failure to actively pursue. The claimant failed to respond or provide an acceptable reason.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to respond but failed to do so.

Practical note

Tribunals will strike out claims for non-pursuit if claimants fail to respond to unless orders or case management directions, even after being given explicit opportunities to explain their position.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
108310/2005
Decision date
11 February 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
public sector
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No