Cases6008976/2024

Claimant v Muller UK & Ireland Group LLP

11 February 2025Before Employment Judge ThompsonManchesterremote video

Outcome

Partly successful£1,077

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages in relation to carried over holiday pay for the year ending 2023. The claimant was entitled to payment of £1,076.90 gross representing this unpaid carried over holiday entitlement.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The tribunal found that the complaint relating to bonus payments for the year ending 2023 was not well-founded. The claimant failed to establish that he was entitled to the bonus payments claimed or that there had been an unauthorised deduction.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The tribunal found that the complaint relating to unpaid expenses was not well-founded. The claimant failed to establish entitlement to the expenses claimed or that there had been an unauthorised deduction from wages.

Facts

The claimant brought claims for unauthorised deduction from wages against Muller UK & Ireland Group LLP relating to three separate matters: carried over holiday pay for the year ending 2023, bonus payments for the year ending 2023, and unpaid expenses. The hearing was conducted remotely via CVP with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.

Decision

The tribunal upheld the claim relating to carried over holiday pay, awarding the claimant £1,076.90 gross. The claims relating to bonus payments and unpaid expenses were dismissed as not well-founded. The claimant is responsible for any tax or national insurance on the award.

Practical note

Employers must ensure that carried over holiday entitlement from previous years is properly paid, while claimants bear the burden of establishing entitlement to discretionary bonus payments and expenses.

Award breakdown

Holiday pay£1,077

Case details

Case number
6008976/2024
Decision date
11 February 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
manufacturing
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No