Claimant v Jones Lang LaSalle Limited

The claim for holiday pay was withdrawn by the claimant during the hearing and dismissed by consent.

The tribunal found that the respondent wrongfully dismissed the claimant in breach of contract. However, no additional compensation was awarded as the claimant had already been paid for his notice period.

The claimant alleged automatic unfair dismissal under section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (likely relating to health and safety or protected disclosures), but the tribunal found the claim was not established and dismissed it.

The tribunal found that the claimant failed to prove direct discrimination on grounds of age. The claim was dismissed as it was not established that age was a material factor in the treatment received.

The tribunal found that the claimant failed to prove direct discrimination on grounds of race. The claim was dismissed as the evidence did not establish that race was a causative factor in the respondent's treatment.

The tribunal found that the claimant failed to prove direct discrimination on grounds of disability. The claim was dismissed as the respondent's actions were not shown to be because of disability.

The tribunal found that the respondent had not failed to make reasonable adjustments. The claim under sections 20, 21 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 was not established and was dismissed.

The tribunal found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages in breach of section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded £632.97 gross to compensate for these deductions.