Cases3310763/2024

Claimant v BP Exploration Operating Company Limited

10 February 2025Before Employment Judge AlliottLondon Easton papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherdismissed on withdrawal

Claimant unequivocally withdrew claim by email dated 8 November 2024. Claim dismissed under Rule 51 following withdrawal with no discretion to reinstate.

Facts

Claimant Mr M Anas brought claim against BP Exploration Operating Company Limited. On 8 November 2024, he unequivocally withdrew his claim by email. A legal officer issued judgment dismissing the claim on 23 December 2024. Claimant sought reconsideration on 2 January 2025, which was treated as an application for fresh consideration by an Employment Judge under Regulation 10A(2).

Decision

Employment Judge Alliott confirmed the decision to dismiss the claim was correct. Following unequivocal withdrawal under Rule 51, the claim came to an end with no discretion to reinstate. The judgment dismissing the claim upon withdrawal stands.

Practical note

Once a claimant unequivocally withdraws their claim, the tribunal has no discretion to reinstate it even if the claimant later changes their mind.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Regulation 10A(2)Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 51Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 7(2)

Case details

Case number
3310763/2024
Decision date
10 February 2025
Hearing type
dismissal on withdrawal
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
energy
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No