Cases2303081/2022

Claimant v Akita Systems Limited

7 February 2025Before Employment Judge BurgeLondon South

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£30,692

Individual claims

Constructive Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found that the claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed. The employer's conduct constituted a fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, entitling the claimant to resign and treat himself as dismissed. The respondent failed to follow the ACAS Code on disciplinary and grievance procedures.

Facts

Mr Ben Wicken brought a claim of constructive unfair dismissal against Akita Systems Limited. The case was heard over four days at London South Employment Tribunal. The claimant was represented by counsel while the respondent was represented by a consultant. The tribunal found that the respondent's conduct constituted a fundamental breach entitling the claimant to resign.

Decision

The tribunal upheld the claim of constructive unfair dismissal. A 50% Polkey reduction was applied to reflect the chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event. The respondent's failure to follow the ACAS Code resulted in a 15% uplift to the compensatory award. No reduction was made for contributory fault. Total award of £30,692.35 was ordered by consent.

Practical note

Employers who breach the implied term of trust and confidence and fail to follow ACAS procedures face constructive dismissal claims with both Polkey reductions and ACAS uplift adjustments affecting the final award.

Award breakdown

Basic award£4,568
Compensatory award£21,846
Loss of statutory rights£275

Adjustments

Polkey reduction50%

50% Polkey reduction applied to compensatory award for past and future loss

ACAS uplift+15%

15% uplift applied for respondent's failure to follow the ACAS Code on disciplinary and grievance procedures

Legal authorities cited

Case details

Case number
2303081/2022
Decision date
7 February 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister