Claimant v Royale Group OPCO Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to disability-related harassment contrary to section 26 of the Equality Act 2010. The claim was upheld against the first respondent as the employer at all material times.
The tribunal dismissed the direct disability discrimination claims as they were statutory alternatives to the harassment claims which had succeeded. Once harassment was established, the alternative direct discrimination claims were not pursued.
The tribunal found the claimant's dismissal to be unfair. A basic award and compensatory award for loss of statutory rights were awarded, with loss of earnings compensated under the discrimination award.
The tribunal upheld the wrongful dismissal claim, finding that the first respondent failed to pay the claimant's contractual notice pay. Notice pay of £2,430.16 was awarded.
The tribunal found the first respondent unlawfully failed to pay commission owed to the claimant. The sum of £6,000 in unpaid commission was awarded as unlawful deduction from wages.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unpaid holiday pay, awarding the claimant £1,093.10 for holiday entitlement that had accrued but not been paid by the first respondent.
Facts
The claimant brought claims against three respondent companies. The second respondent was in administration and claims against it had been struck out. The claimant was employed by the first respondent and brought claims of disability-related harassment, direct disability discrimination, unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and claims for unpaid wages including commission and holiday pay. The respondents did not appear at the hearing.
Decision
The tribunal upheld all substantive claims against the first respondent, finding disability-related harassment, unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and unlawful deductions for commission and holiday pay. Direct discrimination claims were dismissed as statutory alternatives to harassment. The tribunal awarded total compensation of £87,291.24 including injury to feelings, past and future loss of earnings, and a 15% ACAS uplift. Claims against the third respondent were dismissed.
Practical note
In default judgment cases where respondents fail to appear, tribunals will still carefully assess evidence and make awards across multiple successful claims including substantial compensation for disability harassment with injury to feelings in the middle Vento band and significant loss of earnings.
Award breakdown
Vento band: middle
Adjustments
15% ACAS uplift applied to relevant awards totalling £6,378.04 for failure to follow ACAS Code
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1400280/2024
- Decision date
- 7 February 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No