Cases2201648/2024

Claimant v Virgin Active Limited

6 February 2025Before Employment Judge FordeLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed the claim. The respondent successfully defended the dismissal.

Direct Discrimination(race)failed

The tribunal found the claimant's claim of direct race discrimination was not well founded and dismissed it. The evidence did not establish that the claimant was treated less favourably because of race.

Facts

Miss Nasr brought claims of unfair dismissal and direct race discrimination against Virgin Active Limited. The case was heard over four days by video in January 2025. The claimant represented herself while the respondent was represented by counsel.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed both claims, finding them not well-founded. The unfair dismissal claim failed on its merits and the direct race discrimination claim was not established.

Practical note

A self-represented claimant failed to establish either unfair dismissal or race discrimination against a gym/fitness operator represented by counsel.

Case details

Case number
2201648/2024
Decision date
6 February 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No