Cases3303897/2024

Claimant v West Cambs Federation CIC

4 February 2025Before Employment Judge T.R. SmithCambridgeremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds

Individual claims

Failure to Inform & Consultsucceeded

The respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 by dismissing 20 or more employees as redundant without any consultation having taken place with elected employee representatives or a recognised trade union. The tribunal found the respondent breached its statutory duty to inform and consult.

Facts

Multiple claimants were employed as clinical pharmacists at Priory Fields Surgery in Huntingdon. On or after 9 January 2024, 20 or more employees at the establishment were made redundant without any consultation having taken place. There were no elected employee representatives or recognised trade union. The first respondent entered voluntary liquidation and neither respondent filed a response or contested the claim.

Decision

The tribunal found the respondent breached section 188 of TULRCA 1992 by failing to inform and consult over collective redundancies. The tribunal awarded the maximum 90-day protective award starting from 9 January 2024, finding no circumstances to depart from the principle that such awards are punitive. The Recoupment Regulations apply and previous payments from the Insolvency Service must be taken into account.

Practical note

Employers who make 20 or more employees redundant without any consultation will face the maximum 90-day protective award unless there are circumstances making it just not to do so, even where the company is insolvent.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.188Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.189(5)(b)

Case details

Case number
3303897/2024
Decision date
4 February 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
No

Employment details

Role
Clinical pharmacist

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister