Cases1604158/2024

Claimant v Cygnet Behavioural Health Limited

4 February 2025Before Employment Judge S PoveyWalesremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Automatic Unfair Dismissalstruck out

Claim presented out of time. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time, therefore no jurisdiction to determine it.

Whistleblowingstruck out

Complaint of detriment for making protected disclosures was presented out of time. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time, therefore no jurisdiction to determine it.

Wrongful Dismissalstruck out

Claim presented out of time. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time, therefore no jurisdiction to determine it.

Direct Discrimination(race)struck out

Complaint presented out of time and tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit, therefore no jurisdiction to determine it.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)struck out

Complaint presented out of time and tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit, therefore no jurisdiction to determine it.

Harassment(race)struck out

Complaint of harassment on grounds of race presented out of time and tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit, therefore no jurisdiction to determine it.

Harassment(sex)struck out

Complaint of harassment on grounds of sex presented out of time and tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit, therefore no jurisdiction to determine it.

Victimisationstruck out

Complaint presented out of time and tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit, therefore no jurisdiction to determine it.

Facts

The claimant brought multiple claims against a healthcare provider including automatic unfair dismissal for whistleblowing, discrimination on grounds of race and disability, harassment on grounds of race and sex, victimisation, wrongful dismissal and failure to provide written reasons. All claims were presented outside the statutory time limits. This was a preliminary hearing to determine jurisdiction on time limit grounds.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed all claims for want of jurisdiction. For the non-discrimination claims (whistleblowing dismissal, detriment, wrongful dismissal), the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for them to have been presented in time. For the discrimination claims, the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. The tribunal also held it had no jurisdiction over claims under s.14 Equality Act 2010 or the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974.

Practical note

Claimants must comply strictly with time limits - the tribunal will not extend time for discrimination claims unless it is just and equitable to do so, and will dismiss other claims if it was reasonably practicable to present them in time.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 28Equality Act 2010 s.14Health & Safety at Work Act 1974

Case details

Case number
1604158/2024
Decision date
4 February 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep