Cases6016093/2024

Claimant v Digby's Patisserie Ltd

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant was employed for less than two years and therefore does not meet the statutory qualifying period under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.

Facts

The claimant L Gebray was employed by Digby's Patisserie Ltd for less than two years before dismissal. The claimant brought an unfair dismissal complaint and other unspecified complaints. The respondent appears to be a patisserie business in the hospitality sector.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant did not have the required two years continuous service under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant's other complaints remain live and were not affected by this judgment.

Practical note

Unfair dismissal claims require two years qualifying service unless they fall into specific automatically unfair categories, and this threshold requirement will result in strike-out where not met.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6016093/2024
Decision date
4 February 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No