Claimant v The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

The tribunal found that the complaints of being subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure were not well-founded. The claimant failed to establish that she was subjected to any unlawful detriment on the grounds of making protected disclosures.

The tribunal found that the complaint of constructive dismissal was not well-founded. The claimant did not establish that the respondent had breached the implied term of trust and confidence entitling her to resign.

The tribunal found that the complaint of ordinary unfair dismissal was not well-founded, as the claimant did not establish constructive dismissal.

The tribunal found that the complaint of automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A ERA 1996 (dismissal for making protected disclosures) was not well-founded, as constructive dismissal was not established.

The tribunal rejected the whistleblowing claims, finding that the claimant had not been subjected to detriment or dismissed because of making protected disclosures under sections 47B and 103A ERA 1996.