Claimant v Cegedim E-Business Ltd

Struck out on grounds of no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal found that the claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing that he made protected disclosures (no reasonable belief disclosures were in the public interest; matters concerned private grievances). Without protected disclosures, the reason for dismissal could not have been the making of protected disclosures.

Struck out on grounds of no reasonable prospect of success. Because the tribunal found the claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing he made protected disclosures, it necessarily followed he had no reasonable prospect of succeeding in complaints of detrimental treatment on the grounds of making protected disclosures.

Strike out application refused. While the claimant had not yet identified facts from which the tribunal could conclude treatment was because of race, discrimination cases are fact-sensitive and evidence may emerge at hearing. The tribunal concluded the claim had little reasonable prospect of success and made a deposit order, but did not strike it out.

Strike out application refused. The tribunal found potential difficulties in establishing the PCPs and group disadvantage, but could not conclude on limited information that there was no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal concluded the claim had little reasonable prospect of success and made a deposit order, but did not strike it out.