Claimant v HHGL Limited (In Administration)

The respondent stated that no part of the claim is contested. The Employment Judge determined under Rule 22 that the claim of sex discrimination including sexual harassment could properly be determined without a hearing, and the claim succeeded. Remedy to be determined at a later hearing.

The claim included sexual harassment as part of the sex discrimination complaint. The respondent did not contest the claim, and the tribunal found in favour of the claimant under Rule 22 without requiring a full hearing. Remedy remains to be assessed.

The claim was struck out because the claimant did not have the required two years' continuous service under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant had less than two years' service and failed to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.