Claimant v Redfox Education and Technology Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal determined under Rule 22 that the claim could properly be made without a hearing. The respondent was found to have made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages.
Facts
Naomi Bevan brought a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages against Redfox Education and Technology Ltd. The claim was filed on 29 August 2024 in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, resulting in a default judgment.
Decision
Employment Judge Heap determined the claim under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the papers without a hearing. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £238.00 gross.
Practical note
Failure to respond to an employment tribunal claim will result in a default judgment against the respondent under Rule 22.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6009852/2024
- Decision date
- 31 January 2025
- Hearing type
- default judgment
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- education
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No