Cases6004821/2024

Claimant v Premier Modular Limited

31 January 2025Before Employment Judge Ayreremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesstruck out

Claim struck out for being out of time. Claimant was aware of alleged underpayment from 23 October 2023 and knew respondent would not pay back pay, but did not contact ACAS until 17 April 2024, almost three months after the time limit expired on 26 January 2024. Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for claimant to submit claim on time as he knew of his rights, had access to trade union advice, and could easily have checked time limits. Ignorance of time limits did not excuse the delay.

Facts

Claimant worked as an apprentice joiner for respondent from 31 May 2023 to 26 February 2024, paid at £7-£7.35 per hour. On 23 October 2023 he discovered from his apprenticeship agreement that he should have been paid National Minimum Wage for his age (£10.42) rather than apprentice rate for the period before a valid apprenticeship agreement was in place. He raised this with HR who refused back pay but offered to increase pay from May 2024. Claimant did not contact ACAS until 17 April 2024, almost three months after the time limit expired.

Decision

Tribunal found claim was out of time and it did not have jurisdiction to hear it. The tribunal concluded it was reasonably practicable for claimant to present claim on time as he knew of his rights from 23 October 2023, knew respondent would not pay back pay, had access to trade union advice, and could easily have checked time limits online. The almost three-month delay was significant and not excused by ignorance of time limits.

Practical note

Even where a respondent may have admitted liability, tribunals have no jurisdiction to hear claims presented outside time limits unless it was not reasonably practicable to present in time - and knowledge of rights combined with access to advice means ignorance of time limits will not excuse delay.

Legal authorities cited

Bewick v SGA Forecourts Ltd ET Case No.2501693/2014Trevalyans (Birmingham) Ltd v Norton [1991] ICR 488Palmer and another v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council [1984] ICR 372Rodgers v Bodfari (Transport) Ltd [1973] 325 NIRCRadakovits v Abbey National plc [2010] IRLR 307

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.23(4)Employment Rights Act 1996 s.23(3)Employment Rights Act 1996 s.23(2)

Case details

Case number
6004821/2024
Decision date
31 January 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
construction
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Employment details

Role
Apprentice Joiner
Service
9 months

Claimant representation

Represented
No