Claimant v Mr Suresh Arithayas
Outcome
Individual claims
The Second Respondent failed to provide the statutory 12 weeks' notice to which the Claimant was entitled based on her 26 years of continuous service. The Tribunal awarded damages for breach of contract representing the notice pay owed.
The Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. The Second Respondent had not paid the redundancy payment owed based on 26 years' continuous service.
The Second Respondent never provided the Claimant with a written statement of employment particulars following the TUPE transfer on 1 May 2023. The Tribunal awarded an amount equal to two weeks' pay for this breach.
Withdrawn by claimant
Claims for damages for impact on mental health, legal fees of £1,000, and 6 months' earnings were dismissed as they had no legal basis or fell outside the tribunal's jurisdiction.
Facts
The Claimant had 26 years' continuous service when her employment transferred to the Second Respondent under TUPE on 1 May 2023. She worked 23 hours per week and was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 14 May 2023, just two weeks after the transfer. The Second Respondent failed to provide notice pay, redundancy pay, or a written statement of employment particulars.
Decision
The Tribunal found all claims against the Second Respondent well-founded. The Claimant was awarded £2,185 for notice pay (12 weeks), £6,118 for statutory redundancy, and £437 (two weeks' pay) for failure to provide written particulars. All claims against the First Respondent were dismissed, and the holiday pay claim was withdrawn.
Practical note
Following a TUPE transfer, the new employer must honour all statutory obligations including notice pay, redundancy pay, and providing written employment particulars, even where the dismissal occurs shortly after transfer.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1405111/2023
- Decision date
- 31 January 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Employment details
- Service
- 27 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No