Cases6021664/2024

Claimant v Green Motion Leicester

30 January 2025Before Employment Judge HeapMidlands Easton papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant had less than two years' service and therefore did not meet the qualifying period under s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. The tribunal struck out the claim for lacking statutory qualification.

Direct Discriminationnot determined

Discrimination complaints under the Equality Act 2010 were not affected by this strike-out judgment and remain live for determination at a future hearing.

Facts

Mr Gondalia was employed by Green Motion Leicester for less than two years before his dismissal. He brought claims for unfair dismissal and discrimination. The claimant argued that his unfair dismissal claim should proceed because it related to unlawful discrimination.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have the required two years' continuous service under s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996. The judge clarified that discriminatory dismissal complaints must be brought under the Equality Act 2010, not as unfair dismissal claims, and confirmed the discrimination complaints remain live.

Practical note

Unfair dismissal claims require two years' qualifying service; claimants with shorter service alleging discriminatory dismissal must frame their claims under the Equality Act 2010, which has no service requirement.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108Equality Act 2010

Case details

Case number
6021664/2024
Decision date
30 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No