Cases2300960/2022

Claimant v Indigo Service Solutions Limited

29 January 2025Before Employment Judge E FowellCroydonremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)not determined

This preliminary hearing determined only that the claimant was disabled at the time of dismissal on 19 November 2021 due to aphasia following a stroke. The substantive discrimination claims have not yet been heard and will proceed to a full hearing on 23 April 2024.

Facts

The claimant suffered a stroke on 14 April 2021 which left her with aphasia, causing significant difficulties with speech, reading, and comprehension. She spent two months in hospital receiving speech and language therapy, making substantial progress but still experiencing serious ongoing difficulties at discharge. She was dismissed on 19 November 2021, about seven months after the stroke. Despite initially expressing optimism about a quick return to work, an occupational health assessment in September 2021 revealed she still had substantial impairment, with her own assessment that her speech was only 80-90% recovered.

Decision

The tribunal found that the claimant was disabled at the time of her dismissal on 19 November 2021. Although the impairment had not yet lasted 12 months, the tribunal concluded that based on objective evidence in September/November 2021, it was likely that the effects of her stroke would continue to be more than minor or trivial through to April 2022. The tribunal rejected reliance on an optimistic occupational health report, preferring the medical evidence showing substantial ongoing cognitive and communication difficulties.

Practical note

When assessing whether an impairment is 'likely' to be long-term for disability purposes, tribunals must make an objective assessment based only on evidence available at the relevant time, not with hindsight, and should not be swayed by an employee's optimistic self-assessment when medical evidence suggests more serious ongoing difficulties.

Legal authorities cited

Boyle v SCA Packaging Ltd [2009] ICR 1056McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College [2008] ICR 431

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1Equality Act 2010 s.212Equality Act 2010 s.6

Case details

Case number
2300960/2022
Decision date
29 January 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
professional services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister