Cases1306321/2023

Claimant v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council

29 January 2025Before Employment Judge EdmondsBirminghamhybrid

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Harassment(race)failed

Tribunal found that a comment 'I'm like a voodoo doll with needles in her eyes' was made by Miss Shone on 17 July 2023 but the comment related to her own exhaustion from covering the claimant's shift. Although the conduct related to race and religion/belief, it did not have the purpose or effect of harassment. The comment was not directed at the claimant and was a poorly judged throwaway comment, not meeting the reasonableness threshold.

Harassment(religion)failed

Tribunal found the comment related to Voodoo/Voodooism (a protected religion/belief) but did not have the purpose or effect of harassment. The claimant misheard/misremembered the comment. Taking account of his perception, other circumstances and reasonableness, the comment did not have the effect of violating his dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.

Harassment(race)failed

The alleged failure of Mrs McKenzie-Plummer to intervene was considered. She did not challenge or intervene because she did not perceive there to be any issue. The Tribunal found this conduct did not have the effect of harassment taking into account the claimant's perception, the other circumstances and whether it was reasonable for the conduct to have that effect.

Harassment(religion)failed

The alleged failure of Mrs McKenzie-Plummer to intervene in relation to the religion/belief harassment claim failed for the same reasons as the race claim. The conduct did not have the effect of harassment taking into account the claimant's perception, the other circumstances and whether it was reasonable for the conduct to have that effect.

Facts

The claimant, a black African Caribbean Christian support officer, claimed harassment after a comment made by white colleague Miss Shone on 17 July 2023. The claimant failed to attend his shift on 4 June 2023 due to a genuine error, which Miss Shone had to cover. On 17 July, during a conversation about the missed shift, Miss Shone made a comment referencing a voodoo doll. The claimant alleged she said 'I should have sent you a voodoo doll with pins in it'. The Tribunal found she actually said 'I'm like a voodoo doll with needles in her eyes' referring to her own exhaustion. The claimant was on long-term sickness absence from 21 July 2023, which he attributed to this incident.

Decision

The Tribunal found that whilst Voodoo/Voodooism is a protected religion/belief under the Equality Act 2010, and the comment related to race and religion/belief, it did not amount to harassment. The comment did not have the purpose of harassment as it referred to Miss Shone's own exhaustion. It did not have the effect of harassment because the claimant misheard/misremembered it, it was not directed at him, and it was not reasonable for it to have that effect in the circumstances. The claim was dismissed.

Practical note

Even where a comment relates to a protected characteristic, it will not amount to harassment if it was not directed at the claimant and it is not reasonable for it to have the harassing effect, particularly where the claimant has misheard or misremembered what was actually said.

Legal authorities cited

Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2021] UKSC 33Forstater v CGD EuropeR (on the application of Hodkin and anor)Heafield v Times Newspapers LtdAllay (UK) Ltd v GehlenMahood v Irish Centre Housing LtdLaing v Manchester City CouncilRichmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal [2009] ICR 724Igen v Wong [2005] ICR 931Grainger plc v Nicholson

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.136Equality Act 2010 s.26Equality Act 2010 s.109(4)

Case details

Case number
1306321/2023
Decision date
29 January 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Name
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
Sector
local government
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Support Officer
Service
3 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No