Cases4110346/2014

Claimant v Tayside Contracts

28 January 2025Before Employment Judge L WisemanScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for non-pursuit after the claimant failed to provide written reasons or request a hearing by the deadline of 24 December 2024.

Facts

Mr G Clark brought a claim against Tayside Contracts in 2014. On 10 December 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 24 December 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or engage with the Tribunal's order.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide any acceptable reason to prevent strike-out or request a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must actively engage with tribunal directions and deadlines or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit, even in cases that have been ongoing for many years.

Case details

Case number
4110346/2014
Decision date
28 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
public sector
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No