Claimant v Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board
Outcome
Individual claims
Tribunal found claimant was a worker during booked shifts only, and entitlement to holiday pay crystallised after last shift on 18 September 2021. Deduction occurred by 21 October 2021. Claim presented 21 December 2023, more than two years after deduction. S.23(4A) ERA 1996 bars tribunal from considering complaint. No jurisdiction.
Claimant sought payment for accrued untaken holiday under Reg 14 WTR 1998. Tribunal found contract terminated at end of last shift (18 September 2021) not 1 November 2023, so claim presented beyond three-month time limit in Reg 30. Claimant received holiday pay for locum work in October 2021, so was on notice of different treatment for OOH work. It was reasonably practicable to present claim earlier. Tribunal declined to extend time. No jurisdiction.
Facts
The claimant was a GP who worked ad hoc out-of-hours shifts for the respondent NHS health board from June 2020 to September 2021 under a 'GP Consultancy Agreement'. She was paid hourly via PAYE but received no holiday pay. Her last shift was 18 September 2021. The respondent gave notice terminating all such agreements effective 1 November 2023. The claimant brought claims for unpaid accrued holiday pay in December 2023, arguing she was a worker throughout. A key issue was when her contract terminated and whether her claims were in time.
Decision
The tribunal found the claimant was a worker under s.230(3)(b) ERA 1996 during booked shifts only, not under an overarching contract. Each shift was a separate short-term contract. Her entitlement to holiday pay crystallised after her last shift on 18 September 2021. Both claims were out of time: the unlawful deduction claim was barred by the two-year backstop in s.23(4A); the WTR claim was beyond the three-month limit and it was reasonably practicable to claim earlier (she had been paid holiday pay for locum work in October 2021 so was on notice). All claims dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Practical note
Gig workers on framework agreements accrue worker rights during shifts but may lose claims if they don't act promptly after each engagement ends—the two-year backstop and reasonably practicable test can both be fatal even where the worker later discovers the denial of rights.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1603322/2023
- Decision date
- 28 January 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Employment details
- Role
- General Medical Practitioner (Out of Hours)
- Service
- 3 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No