Cases2303694/2024

Claimant v Gravesham Borough Council

28 January 2025Before Employment Judge MortonLondon Southremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal heard evidence over two days and dismissed the unfair dismissal claim under s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found the dismissal to be fair after considering the evidence and submissions from both parties.

Facts

Mr Purdue brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Gravesham Borough Council under s.98 ERA 1996. The case was heard over two days by video hearing. The claimant represented himself while the respondent council was represented by counsel. Oral reasons were given at the conclusion of the hearing.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim, finding it not well-founded. The tribunal heard evidence and submissions from both parties over two days before reaching its decision. Oral reasons were provided at the hearing.

Practical note

This is a straightforward dismissal case where the tribunal found the dismissal to be fair after a full merits hearing with the claimant self-representing against a local authority represented by counsel.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.98

Case details

Case number
2303694/2024
Decision date
28 January 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
public sector
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No