Cases121151/2008

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

28 January 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for non-pursuit after claimant failed to provide written reasons by 24 September 2024 or request a hearing following the tribunal's order of 10 September 2024.

Facts

Mrs Hughes brought a claim against Glasgow City Council with case number 121151/2008. On 10 September 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant until 24 September 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide any acceptable reason.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given adequate opportunity to explain or request a hearing but failed to engage with the tribunal process.

Practical note

Claimants must actively engage with tribunal orders and deadlines or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit, even in long-standing cases.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
121151/2008
Decision date
28 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No