Cases103632/2008

Claimant v Cordia (Services) LLP

27 January 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. Claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing by the tribunal's deadline of 25 September 2024.

Facts

Ms Kelly brought a claim against Cordia (Services) LLP and Glasgow City Council in 2008. The claim was not actively pursued by the claimant. On 11 September 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 25 September 2024 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or request a hearing.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing within the deadline set by the tribunal.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal directions; failure to do so will result in the claim being struck out for non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 Rule 37Rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
103632/2008
Decision date
27 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No