Cases4110977/2014

Claimant v West Dunbartonshire Council

27 January 2025Before Employment Judge L WisemanScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out for non-pursuit under rule 38(1)(d). Correspondence to claimant returned marked 'gone away', no new address provided, and previous legal representatives withdrew without holding an alternative address.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim against West Dunbartonshire Council but subsequently ceased contact with the tribunal. Correspondence sent to the claimant's address was returned marked 'gone away'. The claimant's previous legal representatives withdrew from the case and held no alternative address for the claimant beyond that on the claim form.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant's failure to maintain contact or provide an updated address demonstrated a lack of active pursuit.

Practical note

Claimants must maintain contact with the tribunal and provide updated contact details; failure to do so can result in strike-out for non-pursuit even where legal representatives previously acted.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024 Schedule 1 Rule 38Rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4110977/2014
Decision date
27 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
West Dunbartonshire Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No