Cases105249/2006

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

27 January 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for non-pursuit after claimant failed to provide written reasons by 26 August 2024 or request a hearing following tribunal opportunity given on 12 August 2024.

Facts

Mrs Rushton brought a claim against Glasgow City Council with case number 105249/2006. On 12 August 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant until 26 August 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain but failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must respond to tribunal orders giving an opportunity to show cause against strike-out, as failure to engage will result in the claim being struck out for non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 Rule 37Rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
105249/2006
Decision date
27 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No