Cases1400928/2024

Claimant v Jessica Davies

24 January 2025Before Employment Judge FergusonBristolin person

Outcome

Partly successful£2,076

Individual claims

Breach of Contractfailed

The tribunal determined that the claim for notice pay failed. The judgment does not provide detailed reasoning in this document, as reasons were given orally at the hearing.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The tribunal found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement in breach of Working Time Regulations. The Claimant was awarded £1,407 in unpaid holiday pay.

Othersucceeded

The tribunal found that when the proceedings began, the Respondent was in breach of its duty to provide written statement of particulars of employment under s.1 ERA 1996. An uplift was applied under s.38 Employment Act 2002.

Facts

The Claimant worked for the Respondent, an individual employer (Jessica Davies), but did not receive a written statement of employment particulars. The employment relationship ended and the Claimant brought claims for notice pay and unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal was required to determine the Claimant's employment status as a preliminary issue.

Decision

The tribunal found that the Claimant was both an employee and a worker. The claim for notice pay failed, but the claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeded and the Claimant was awarded £1,407. Because the Respondent failed to provide written particulars of employment, an additional uplift of two weeks' pay (£669.22) was awarded under s.38 Employment Act 2002, bringing the total award to £2,076.22.

Practical note

Failure to provide written statement of particulars can result in a mandatory uplift of between two and four weeks' pay when a claimant succeeds in related claims, significantly increasing the employer's liability.

Award breakdown

Holiday pay£1,407

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.230(1)Employment Act 2002 s.38ERA 1996 s.230(3)ERA 1996 s.1

Case details

Case number
1400928/2024
Decision date
24 January 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep